A domestic assault charge can immediately affect where you live, whom you may contact and your relationship with your spouse, partner or family. Even before the case is decided, an accused person may be prohibited from returning home or communicating with the complainant.
Jake Shen is a Toronto criminal defence lawyer and former Toronto police officer. He represents clients facing domestic assault and related criminal charges and reviews police statements, recordings, electronic communications and other evidence to identify issues that may affect the case.
Domestic assault generally refers to an assault allegation involving people who are or were in an intimate, romantic or family relationship.
This may include allegations involving:
Domestic assault is not a separate offence under the Criminal Code. Depending on the allegations, a person may be charged with common assault, assault with a weapon, assault causing bodily harm, aggravated assault or another related offence.
The domestic relationship may affect how police respond, the conditions imposed after an arrest, how the Crown approaches the prosecution and the sentence imposed following a conviction.
A domestic incident may result in one or more criminal charges.
Common assault may involve intentionally applying force to another person without consent. It may also include an attempt or threat to apply force where the accused appears capable of carrying out the threat.
An allegation involving pushing, grabbing, slapping or other unwanted physical contact may result in a common assault charge even when there is no visible injury.
This charge may arise when a person is accused of using or threatening to use an object during an alleged assault. An ordinary household object may be considered a weapon depending on how it was used or intended to be used.
A person may face this charge when the alleged assault causes an injury that interferes with the complainant’s health or comfort and is more than merely temporary or minor.
Aggravated assault is a serious charge involving an allegation that the complainant was wounded, maimed, disfigured or had their life endangered.
An argument between partners or family members may result in an allegation that one person knowingly threatened to cause death or bodily harm. A threat charge may be laid even when no physical contact occurred.
Repeated communication, following, watching a person’s home or workplace, or threatening conduct may result in a criminal harassment charge if the alleged behaviour caused the complainant to reasonably fear for their safety.
Damage to a door, cellphone, vehicle or other property during a domestic dispute may lead to a mischief charge in addition to an assault allegation.
After an arrest, an accused person may be ordered not to contact the complainant or attend certain locations. Contact made in violation of those conditions may result in an additional criminal charge.
The Crown must prove every essential element of the alleged offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
For a domestic assault allegation, the Crown may need to establish:
The fact that the accused and complainant were spouses, partners or family members does not remove the Crown’s obligation to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.
The defence may examine whether the accounts are reliable and internally consistent, whether other evidence supports the allegation and whether the police investigation was complete and lawful.
Evidence may include:
Domestic assault cases may involve conflicting descriptions of an incident that occurred in private. Details surrounding the argument, the conduct of both parties and communications before and after the alleged event may require careful review.
Differences between the initial 911 call, the complainant’s police statement and later testimony may also be relevant when assessing the reliability of the evidence.
The available defence depends on the facts, evidence and specific charge. Possible issues may include the following.
The accused may deny applying or threatening force. The defence may examine whether the allegation is supported by independent evidence and whether the complainant’s account has remained consistent.
Section 34 of the Criminal Code recognizes self-defence in appropriate circumstances. The court may consider whether the accused reasonably believed that force or a threat of force was being used, whether the accused acted to protect themselves or another person and whether the response was reasonable in the circumstances.
For many assault allegations, the Crown must prove that the physical contact occurred without consent. Whether consent existed depends on the evidence and the surrounding circumstances. The law also limits when consent may provide a defence, particularly where bodily harm was intentionally caused.
An accidental application of force does not necessarily constitute assault. The evidence may raise a reasonable doubt about whether the contact was intentional.
The defence may challenge testimony affected by inconsistencies, memory problems, perception difficulties or contradictions with recordings, messages, photographs or other evidence.
In some cases, the surrounding evidence may raise an issue concerning whether the complainant had a reason to make a false or exaggerated allegation. A possible motive does not by itself determine the case, but it may be considered together with the reliability of the evidence.
Police must respect the rights protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Issues may arise concerning detention, arrest, search, access to legal counsel or statements obtained by police.
Not every defence applies to every case. The disclosure and individual circumstances must be reviewed before a defence strategy can be determined.
Police may arrest and charge a person after responding to a domestic complaint. Depending on the circumstances, the accused may be released by police or held for a bail hearing.
Release conditions may prohibit the accused from:
The case will normally proceed through several stages:
The accused must comply with all release conditions unless they are formally changed. A complainant cannot personally give the accused permission to disobey a court order or police undertaking.
A person charged with domestic assault may be prohibited from contacting the complainant directly or indirectly.
Indirect contact may include sending a message through:
The accused may also be prohibited from returning home, even when they own or rent the residence.
If a condition is causing difficulties involving housing, children, employment or personal property, a lawyer may determine whether a variation can be requested. The existing condition must continue to be followed unless and until it is formally changed.
Disobeying a release condition may result in a new criminal charge and may affect whether the accused is released again.
The complainant does not normally control whether a domestic assault prosecution continues. Once police lay a charge, the Crown prosecutor decides how the case will proceed.
A complainant may provide additional information or state that they no longer want the prosecution to continue. However, this does not automatically result in the charge being withdrawn.
The Crown may consider:
An accused person should not contact the complainant to ask them to withdraw or change the allegation, particularly when a no-contact condition is in effect.
The possible outcome depends on the particular charge, the seriousness of the allegation, the accused’s criminal record, the presence of injuries or weapons and the circumstances of the relationship.
Potential outcomes may include withdrawal of the charge, a peace bond, counselling-related resolutions where available, a discharge, probation, a fine, a conditional sentence or imprisonment.
Under the Criminal Code, evidence that an offence involved the abuse of an intimate partner or family member may be treated as an aggravating factor at sentencing.
No particular outcome can be predicted without reviewing the evidence and individual circumstances.
A domestic assault charge or conviction may create immigration consequences for a person who is not a Canadian citizen. The potential effect depends on the offence, the way the case is resolved, the sentence and the person’s immigration status.
Where immigration consequences may arise, coordinated advice from criminal and immigration counsel should be considered before making decisions about a plea or resolution.
A domestic assault case and a family-law proceeding are separate matters, but they may affect each other.
Criminal release conditions may restrict communication between the parties or prevent an accused person from attending the family residence. The existence of criminal allegations may also be raised in parenting or family-court proceedings.
A criminal defence lawyer can address the criminal charge and release conditions. Separate advice from a family lawyer may also be necessary where parenting, separation, support or property issues are involved.
Before becoming a criminal defence lawyer, Jake Shen served as a Toronto police officer. This experience provides practical insight into how police respond to domestic complaints, interview the people involved, collect evidence and prepare criminal cases.
As defence counsel, Jake reviews the investigation from the perspective of the accused and examines whether the evidence supports the charge, whether witness accounts are reliable, whether relevant evidence was preserved and whether the accused’s legal rights were respected.
If you have been charged with domestic assault in Toronto, Markham or elsewhere in Ontario, obtaining advice early may help you understand the allegations, release conditions and available options.
Contact Jake Shen to discuss the charge, the evidence and the next steps in the criminal court process.
The information on this page is general information and is not individualized legal advice. Reading this page or submitting a contact form does not by itself create a lawyer-client relationship.