A person who is arrested may be released by police or held in custody for a bail hearing. The result can determine whether the accused remains in custody while the case proceeds and what conditions must be followed after release.
Jake Shen is a Toronto criminal defence lawyer and former Toronto police officer. He represents clients at bail hearings and assists accused persons and proposed sureties in preparing a release plan that addresses the concerns raised by the Crown and the court.
A bail hearing is a court proceeding in which a justice determines whether an accused person should be released or detained while the criminal charge is before the court.
A bail hearing does not determine whether the accused is guilty. The charge has not yet been proven, and the accused remains presumed innocent.
The court may:
The appropriate release order depends on the charges, the accused’s circumstances and the grounds raised at the hearing.
Section 493.1 of the Criminal Code requires primary consideration to be given to releasing the accused at the earliest reasonable opportunity and on the least onerous conditions that are appropriate in the circumstances.
Conditions should also be reasonably practical for the accused to follow.
This approach is sometimes described as the ladder principle. The court should not automatically impose a more restrictive form of release when a less onerous form would adequately address the identified risks.
A surety, cash deposit, house arrest or other restrictive condition is not required in every case.
Police may release an accused person from the station with an appearance notice, undertaking or other release document.
A bail hearing may be required where police do not release the accused. This may occur where police allege concerns involving:
A person held for bail is brought before a justice in accordance with the applicable legal requirements.
Section 515 of the Criminal Code identifies three grounds on which an accused may be detained.
The primary ground concerns whether detention is necessary to ensure that the accused attends court.
The court may consider factors such as:
A person is not automatically detained because they are not a Canadian citizen or do not own property.
The secondary ground concerns the protection or safety of the public, including complainants and witnesses.
The court may consider:
Conditions should be connected to an actual concern and should not be more restrictive than reasonably necessary.
The tertiary ground concerns maintaining confidence in the administration of justice.
The court considers all the circumstances, including:
The seriousness of the charge alone does not automatically require detention. The statutory factors must be assessed together.
In many bail hearings, the Crown must show why the accused should be detained or why particular restrictions are necessary.
In some circumstances, the accused may bear the burden of showing why release is justified. This is commonly called a reverse-onus bail hearing.
A reverse onus may apply in circumstances identified by the Criminal Code, including certain allegations involving:
Whether a reverse onus applies depends on the precise charge and circumstances.
A reverse onus does not remove the presumption of innocence. It changes which party bears the burden on the issue of release.
A surety is a person who agrees to supervise an accused person after release and help ensure that the accused follows the bail conditions.
A surety is not simply a character reference or someone who pays money to secure release. The surety assumes an ongoing supervisory responsibility.
A proposed surety should understand:
A surety should not agree to supervise unless prepared to carry out these responsibilities.
There is no single category of person who must act as a surety. Depending on the circumstances, a proposed surety may be:
The court may consider:
Owning a home or having substantial wealth does not automatically make someone a suitable surety.
A surety may be expected to:
The exact responsibilities depend on the release plan and the court order.
A surety should not promise a level of supervision that cannot realistically be provided.
A surety may be required to pledge an amount of money. A pledge is not necessarily the same as depositing cash with the court immediately.
The amount should relate to the circumstances and should be meaningful to the surety without being unattainable.
If the accused breaches the release order, the Crown may begin proceedings seeking forfeiture of the pledged amount. Forfeiture is not necessarily automatic, and the surety may have an opportunity to respond.
The exact form of release determines whether a pledge or deposit is required.
A bail plan should respond to the specific concerns raised by the allegations and the accused’s circumstances.
A proposed plan may address:
A plan should be realistic. Conditions that the accused cannot reasonably follow may increase the risk of an unintentional breach.
The most restrictive possible plan is not automatically the best plan. The proposed conditions should be necessary, appropriate and connected to the risks identified in the case.
Information considered at a bail hearing may include:
The evidentiary rules at a bail hearing differ from those at trial. The court may receive information that would not necessarily be admitted in the same manner at trial.
The bail hearing does not determine the accused’s guilt or innocence.
The Crown may consent to a proposed release or oppose release.
Where release is contested:
The process may vary depending on whether the Crown or accused bears the burden.
Release conditions may include:
Conditions must be followed exactly unless they are formally varied or removed.
A no-contact condition may prohibit both direct and indirect communication.
Indirect communication may include sending a message through:
The complainant cannot personally give the accused permission to ignore a no-contact order.
If communication is necessary for children, property, employment or another important reason, a lawyer can assess whether a formal variation should be requested.
Release conditions do not automatically change because the accused and complainant agree to different arrangements.
Depending on the type of order and circumstances, a change may require:
Until the change is legally approved, the existing conditions remain in effect.
An accused person should not test or ignore a condition while waiting for it to be changed.
Failing to follow a release condition may result in:
A breach allegation may also affect the Crown’s position in the original case.
The Crown must prove the breach charge, including the required mental element. However, an accused person should obtain legal advice rather than assume that a condition is optional or unenforceable.
A surety is not required to continue indefinitely if they are no longer willing or able to supervise.
The surety may apply to be relieved of the obligation. This process can result in the accused returning to custody unless another lawful release arrangement is made.
A surety who wishes to withdraw should obtain instructions from the court or legal advice. The surety should not simply stop supervising while remaining named on the release order.
An accused who is detained may be able to seek a bail review in the Superior Court of Justice.
A bail review is not simply a second opportunity to repeat the same hearing. The application generally requires a recognized legal basis, such as:
The transcript, exhibits, release plan and reasons from the original hearing may be important.
Strict procedural requirements and timelines may apply.
A bail hearing may occur shortly after arrest, but the resulting order can remain in place for months or longer.
A properly prepared hearing may require:
An incomplete or unrealistic plan may make release more difficult.
Before becoming a criminal defence lawyer, Jake Shen served as a Toronto police officer. This experience provides practical insight into arrest, police release decisions, risk assessments and the information presented to the Crown following an investigation.
As defence counsel, Jake reviews the allegations and the accused’s circumstances, prepares the proposed release plan and assists sureties in understanding the responsibilities they may be asked to assume.
If a family member or another person has been arrested and held for bail in Toronto, Markham or elsewhere in Ontario, early preparation may help identify suitable sureties and develop a workable release plan.
Contact Jake Shen to discuss the charges, the proposed surety and the next steps in the bail process.
The information on this page is general information and is not individualized legal advice. Reading this page or submitting a contact form does not by itself create a lawyer-client relationship.