Drug Trafficking Charges in Ontario

What Is Drug Trafficking Under Canadian Law?

Drug trafficking offences are primarily governed by the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.

Trafficking is broader than selling a controlled substance for money. Depending on the circumstances, it may include:

• Selling a controlled substance;
• Giving or transferring a controlled substance to another person;
• Transporting, sending or delivering a controlled substance;
• Administering a controlled substance;
• Offering to perform an act that would constitute trafficking; or
• Selling an authorization to obtain a controlled substance.

A person may therefore face a trafficking allegation even when no money changed hands.

The applicable charge and possible consequences depend on the substance, the accused’s alleged conduct and the surrounding circumstances.

Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking

Section 5 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act also prohibits possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of trafficking.

Police may rely on circumstantial evidence when alleging that drugs were possessed for distribution rather than personal use. This evidence may include:

• The quantity and packaging of the substance;
• Scales, packaging materials or other seized items;
• Cash;
• Multiple cellphones;
• Text messages or electronic communications;
• Observations of people entering or leaving a location;
• Police surveillance;
• Expert opinion evidence; and
• Statements allegedly made by the accused.

No single factor necessarily proves an intention to traffic. The evidence must be considered as a whole.

Possession of a controlled substance and possession for the purpose of trafficking are different allegations. For possession for the purpose of trafficking, the Crown must prove both knowing possession and the intention to traffic.

Common Drug-Related Charges

A police investigation may result in several different charges.

Drug Trafficking

This charge may arise when a person is accused of selling, transferring, giving, transporting, sending or delivering a controlled substance.

Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking

This charge may be laid when police allege that a person possessed drugs with the intention of trafficking them at a later time.

Simple Possession

Simple possession generally concerns knowing possession of a controlled substance without an allegation that it was intended for trafficking.

Drug Production

Production allegations may involve manufacturing, synthesizing, cultivating or otherwise producing a controlled substance.

Importing or Exporting

A person may be charged with importing a controlled substance into Canada, exporting it from Canada or possessing it for the purpose of export.

Conspiracy

A conspiracy charge may arise where two or more people are alleged to have agreed to commit a drug-related offence.

Possession of Proceeds of Crime

Police may allege that money, vehicles or other property were obtained through drug trafficking or another criminal offence.

Firearms and Weapons Offences

A drug investigation may also result in firearms or weapons charges when police seize a weapon during a search or arrest.

What Is Possession?

To prove possession, the Crown generally must establish that the accused had knowledge of the substance and exercised control over it.

Possession may be alleged in different ways.

Personal Possession

Personal possession refers to an item found directly on the accused, such as in clothing, a bag or another object carried by the person.

Constructive Possession

Constructive possession may be alleged when the substance was not physically on the accused but the Crown claims that the accused knew where it was and exercised control over it.

Joint Possession

More than one person may be alleged to possess the same substance. The Crown must still prove the required knowledge and control for each accused person.

Mere presence in a vehicle, residence or other place where drugs are found does not automatically establish possession.

What Must the Crown Prove?

The Crown must prove every essential element of the alleged offence beyond a reasonable doubt.

For a drug trafficking or possession-for-the-purpose-of-trafficking charge, the Crown may need to establish:

• The identity of the accused;
• That the substance was prohibited or controlled by law;
• That the accused knew of the substance;
• That the accused exercised control over the substance;
• That the accused trafficked the substance, where trafficking is alleged;
• That the accused intended to traffic the substance, where possession for the purpose of trafficking is alleged;
• The nature and quantity of the substance; and
• That the evidence supports the particular offence charged.

The prosecution may rely on direct or circumstantial evidence. The accused does not have to prove that the drugs belonged to someone else. The Crown must prove the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Evidence in a Drug Trafficking Case

Evidence may include:

• Controlled substances seized by police;
• Laboratory analysis;
• Police surveillance;
• Undercover-officer evidence;
• Confidential-informant information;
• Search-warrant materials;
• Text messages and encrypted communications;
• Cellphone and computer data;
• Photographs and video;
• Financial records;
• Cash and transaction records;
• Fingerprint or DNA evidence;
• Packaging materials or scales;
• Evidence from other people present at the location;
• Expert opinion concerning the intended use of the drugs; and
• Statements allegedly made by the accused.

The defence may examine whether the evidence reliably connects the accused to the substance and whether police obtained the evidence lawfully.

Search Warrants and Police Searches

Drug investigations often involve searches of:

• Homes;
• Apartments;
• Vehicles;
• Storage units;
• Businesses;
• Cellphones;
• Computers;
• Packages; and
• Personal belongings.

Police may rely on a search warrant or another legal authority. In limited circumstances, they may conduct a warrantless search.

The defence may examine:

• Whether police had lawful authority to conduct the search;
• Whether the warrant was supported by reliable information;
• Whether relevant information was omitted or presented inaccurately;
• Whether police remained within the scope of the warrant;
• Whether seized items were properly documented and preserved; and
• Whether the accused’s Charter rights were respected.

A search warrant does not automatically establish that the search or seizure was lawful in every respect.

Cellphone and Electronic Evidence

Electronic evidence may play an important role in drug trafficking cases. Police may rely on messages, contact lists, photographs, location information and data from communication applications.

The defence may examine:

• Who owned or used the device;
• Whether other people had access to it;
• Whether the messages were complete;
• Whether the identity of the sender or recipient can be established;
• Whether the language has been interpreted accurately;
• Whether the data was obtained lawfully; and
• Whether the messages actually relate to trafficking.

Possession of a cellphone does not automatically prove authorship of every message stored on the device.

Confidential Informants

Police may obtain information from a confidential informant and use that information to seek judicial authorization for a search.

The identity of a confidential informant is generally protected. However, the defence may examine whether the information provided to obtain the warrant was sufficiently reliable and whether police independently confirmed important details.

A court may review whether the warrant could lawfully have been issued after information that should not have been included is removed or material omissions are considered.

Possible Defences to a Drug Trafficking Charge

The available defence depends on the evidence and circumstances. Possible issues may include the following.

Lack of Knowledge

The accused may not have known that drugs were present in a residence, vehicle, package or other location.

Knowledge cannot automatically be inferred only because a person was present where a substance was found.

Lack of Possession or Control

The Crown must establish the required connection between the accused and the substance. Drugs found in a shared residence or vehicle may have been accessible to several people.

Ownership or occupancy of a location does not necessarily establish control over every item found there.

Personal Use Rather Than Trafficking

The accused may admit or be found to possess a substance while disputing the allegation that it was intended for trafficking.

The quantity, packaging, surrounding items, communications and expert evidence may be examined when determining the alleged purpose of possession.

Lack of Intent to Traffic

The evidence may not establish that the accused intended to sell, give, transfer, transport, send or deliver the substance.

Suspicious circumstances do not automatically prove the specific intention required for possession for the purpose of trafficking.

Identity

The Crown must prove that the accused was the person who participated in the alleged transaction or controlled the relevant drugs, account, device or location.

Surveillance quality, identification procedures and electronic evidence may require careful examination.

Unwitting Participation

A person may transport a package, money or another item without knowing that it is connected to a controlled substance.

The fact that a person delivered or possessed an item does not by itself establish knowledge of its contents.

Problems With the Substance or Continuity

The Crown must prove the nature of the substance and connect the tested substance to the item allegedly seized.

The defence may examine laboratory results, police handling of exhibits and the continuity of the evidence from seizure through testing.

Charter Violations

Potential Charter issues may involve:

• Unlawful detention;
• Unlawful arrest;
• An unreasonable search or seizure;
• Problems with a search warrant;
• Denial or delay of access to counsel;
• Improper cellphone searches; or
• Statements obtained in violation of the accused’s rights.

Where a Charter breach is established, the defence may seek exclusion of evidence or another appropriate remedy.

Not every defence applies to every case. The disclosure and individual circumstances must be reviewed before a defence strategy can be determined.

What Happens After a Drug Trafficking Charge?

Following an arrest, the accused may be released by police or held for a bail hearing. The Crown may seek detention depending on the allegations, the accused’s circumstances and the evidence.

Release conditions may restrict:

• Communication with co-accused or other individuals;
• Attendance at particular addresses;
• Possession of cellphones or communication devices;
• Possession of weapons;
• Travel; or
• Compliance with other specified terms.

The case will normally proceed through several stages:

• Release or bail;
• First court appearance;
• Receipt and review of Crown disclosure;
• Review of search-warrant materials;
• Crown pre-trial discussions;
• Judicial pre-trial;
• Charter applications or other motions;
• Resolution discussions; and
• Trial, if the matter is not otherwise resolved.

Drug cases may involve large amounts of disclosure, including surveillance, electronic records and expert evidence.

Will a Drug Trafficking Charge Result in Jail?

The possible sentence depends on several factors, including:

• The controlled substance involved;
• The quantity and value alleged;
• The accused’s role;
• The duration and organization of the conduct;
• Whether weapons or violence were involved;
• Whether the offence occurred near young people;
• Whether a person under 18 was involved;
• The accused’s criminal record; and
• Other aggravating or mitigating circumstances.

The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act provides different maximum penalties depending on the substance and offence. Some trafficking, importing and production offences involving Schedule I or II substances carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

The maximum penalty does not determine the sentence in an individual case. No particular outcome can be predicted without reviewing the facts, the accused’s circumstances and the applicable law.

Drug Charges and Immigration Status

A drug trafficking charge or conviction may create serious immigration consequences for a permanent resident, foreign national or other person who is not a Canadian citizen.

The potential effect depends on the offence, sentence and individual immigration status. Coordinated advice from criminal and immigration counsel should be considered before decisions are made concerning a plea or resolution.

Forfeiture of Money and Property

Police may seize cash, vehicles, electronic devices or other property that they allege is connected to a drug offence or represents proceeds of crime.

Seizure does not automatically mean that the property will be permanently forfeited. Separate legal procedures may determine whether the Crown can retain the property.

The ownership, use and source of the property may require examination.

Why Experience With Police Investigations Matters

Before becoming a criminal defence lawyer, Jake Shen served as a Toronto police officer. This experience provides practical insight into how police conduct surveillance, prepare search-warrant applications, execute searches, interview suspects and preserve evidence.

As defence counsel, Jake reviews the investigation from the perspective of the accused and examines whether the evidence establishes knowledge, possession and intent, whether police acted within their lawful authority and whether the accused’s Charter rights were respected.

Speak With a Toronto Criminal Defence Lawyer

If you have been charged with drug trafficking or possession for the purpose of trafficking in Toronto, Markham or elsewhere in Ontario, obtaining legal advice early may help you understand the evidence, release conditions and court process.

Contact Jake Shen to discuss the charge, the evidence and the next steps in the criminal court process.

Tell Us About Your Case

The information on this page is general information and is not individualized legal advice. Reading this page or submitting a contact form does not by itself create a lawyer-client relationship.